首页 > 新闻 > 正文

杀马特

“次抛风”刮进防晒圈_我的网站

我亲爱的小冤家

一 | 随着大众护肤观念不断更新，如今防晒产品已摆脱“夏日限定”标签，成为贯穿全年的日常刚需。

Foreign ministers and top diplomats of the Pacific Islands countries attend a meeting of the Pacific Islands Forum (PIF) in Suva, Fiji, on August 7, 2026, ahead of the full leaders meeting scheduled for September 2026 in Palau. Photo: VCG
As foreign ministers and senior representatives from Pacific nations convened in Suva for the Pacific Islands Forum (PIF) to discuss key regional issues, New Zealand's foreign minister reportedly pushed to secure a joint statement condemning China's missile tests in July, however, his effort ultimately fell flat. A Chinese expert described the outcome as a clear rebuke to Canberra and Wellington's ingrained habit of speaking for the Pacific, saying the two countries must come to terms with a shifting reality: Pacific Island states are increasingly unwilling to let Australia and New Zealand dictate who their friends, foes and perceived security threats should be.
Pacific Island foreign ministers failed to agree on Friday to a joint response to China's missile launch in July, with further discussions expected at the Pacific leaders meeting at the end of August, said New Zealand Foreign Minister Winston Peters, according to Reuters.
According to a report from Radio New Zealand, there has not been a unanimous statement from Pacific nations about China's test-launch in July, and Peters said New Zealand had been pushing for one. Peters claimed that the Pacific missed an opportunity not to issue a joint statement soon after China's launch.
Australia's Foreign Minister Penny Wong said before the meeting that she hoped China took note of the "very clear response" already sent from the Pacific about the test, according to AFP.
Peters' push for a joint PIF statement on China's missile tests, together with Wong's remarks, are less about technical security concerns than an effort to turn their own anxieties about China into a regional agenda and pressure Beijing under the forum's collective banner. His description of Pacific Island countries' refusal to single out China as a "missed opportunity" also reveals little respect for their independent judgment, Chen Hong, director of the New Zealand Studies Centre, East China Normal University, told the Global Times.
The result is a clear rebuke to Canberra and Wellington's long-standing habit of arrogantly "speaking for" the Pacific, as island states are increasingly unwilling to let Australia and New Zealand decide who their friends, foes or security threats should be, said Chen Hong.
The Chinese People's Liberation Army Navy said on July 6 that one of its strategic nuclear submarines successfully launched a strategic missile toward relevant high seas of the Pacific Ocean, which landed precisely within the designated waters. China notified relevant countries in advance of the test launch, a move that demonstrates the openness and transparency of the Chinese armed forces, Chen Xi, a spokesperson for the Ministry of National Defense, said at a press conference on July 7.
Chen Hong also noted that Peters' recent China-related rhetoric has become increasingly populist and hawkish as elections approach in New Zealand. "Such an approach risks undermining New Zealand's long-standing reputation for pragmatic, independent, and rational diplomacy," Chen Hong said.
In July, during a parliamentary debate on New Zealand's Covid-19 pandemic response, Peters, who is also leader of the populist New Zealand First party, told a Chinese-born lawmaker to "go back to your own country" while mocking his English proficiency. His remarks drew wide criticism in New Zealand.
Yet Australia and New Zealand continued to amplify missile-related issues and great-power rivalry, pushing the "China threat" narrative to the center of the regional agenda while sidelining the priorities that matter most to Pacific Island nations, said Chinese analysts.
Chen Hong noted that for island states, the most urgent concerns are not geopolitical competition but everyday challenges: climate change, energy security, development financing, infrastructure and economic resilience. By shifting the focus from these concerns to strategic rivalry among major powers, Australia and New Zealand risk distorting the region's real priorities and undermining the aspirations of Pacific Island countries.
According to an introduction on the forum website, "The Forum's Pacific Vision is for a resilient region of peace, harmony, security, social inclusion and prosperity, so that all Pacific people can lead free, healthy, and productive lives."
At the opening of the meeting, Rick Houenipwela, foreign minister of the Solomon Islands and chair of the meeting, said that the Pacific's agenda must continue to be "conceived ⁠by the Pacific, shaped by the Pacific and only by the Pacific," according to Reuters.
Chen Hong said Pacific Island nations have made their position clear: differences with China do not mean signing up to the strategic agendas of Australia and New Zealand. A growing number of island countries refuse to be trapped in the black-and-white binary choice of siding with either China or the West.
If Canberra and Wellington keep pushing rhetoric beyond the regional consensus, they risk undermining the very institution they claim to support. The PIF's strength lies not in issuing confrontational statements, but in preserving Pacific unity. Turning that consensus into a tool for pressuring China would erode the forum's cohesion and weaken its central role in the region, said Chen Hong.
。同时，因消费场景的不断细分，消费者对防晒产品的期待也从单一的防护力，转向兼具便捷与卫生等功效。近日，记者走访北京多家零售卖场发现，次抛防晒霜、独立封装次抛防晒口罩等产品购销两旺，将即开即用、轻量化的体验延伸至防晒领域，为全季节、碎片化防晒提供了新选择。图为次抛防晒口罩。　　记者在多家卖场的美妆护肤专区看到，Mistine等品牌的次抛防晒霜被摆在显眼位置。电商平台上，蕉下、骆驼等户外品牌也纷纷跨界推出次抛防晒霜。不同于主流30克、50克等大容量瓶装防晒霜，这类产品单袋容量仅约1克，剂量恰好满足面部与颈部单次涂抹。　　“次抛防晒产品上架以来很受欢迎，目前门店库存已经基本售罄，正等待补货。”某美妆门店导购介绍，以往消费者选购防晒产品多比拼SPF（防晒系数）数值，如今越来越多顾客优先关注其使用的便捷性与卫生性。

二 | 正在店内选购商品的焉女士对此深有体会：“瓶装防晒霜随身携带容易渗漏，补涂时很难把控用量，涂少了防护不足，涂多了又容易搓泥。这种次抛款一次一支，外出补涂非常方便。

三 | ”　　业内人士指出，次抛模式的核心价值不仅在于定量使用，更在于“锁鲜”。由于次抛单支容量即为一次性用量，大大减少了配方成分与空气接触的机会，能更好地保持其活性，适合封装含有易失活成分的产品。　　记者在采访中还发现，次抛模式不仅限于防晒霜，在名创优品等快消品门店，独立封装的次抛防晒口罩也成为销售亮点。以某品牌8片装的次抛防晒口罩为例，包装上明确标注了“次抛免洗”“纳米微晶防晒科技”“UPF50+防护标准”等信息。“不少敏感肌顾客偏爱这款，长时间佩戴传统可水洗口罩或防晒面罩容易闷肤长痘，次抛款式干净清爽，通勤、骑行使用十分方便。”门店工作人员介绍。　　次抛模式兴起的背后，是防晒消费场景的全面延伸。艾媒咨询调研显示，如今防晒已从单一的户外场景渗透到通勤、办公、旅游等方方面面，成为全场景日常需求。业内人士分析，次抛包装本质上是对当下消费者卫生焦虑与轻装上阵等心理的精准回应，将防晒从长时间户外的“全副武装”转变为随时随地进行的“轻防护”。

四 | 　　某美妆品牌负责人表示，除常见的次抛精华外，防晒、卸妆等产品也开始尝试次抛形式，且市场的竞争核心正从早期的包装形式和基础成分，向更深层次的技术壁垒、精准功效和场景洞察转移。　　产业发展趋势同样印证了这一变化。中国香料香精化妆品工业协会在近日发布的《2025年中国化妆品产业发展报告》中指出，化妆品竞争已由单一功效比拼转向原料、配方、包装、消费体验在内的多维较量，消费者选购标准持续升级，更加看重产品安全性、实用性与使用体验。消费需求、生活场景持续变化催生大量细分赛道，或许次抛防晒产品的兴起正是这一趋势的生动体现。